I've seen theories that the killer locked the doors on the way out. I'm only trying to make sense of what would cause two, or one, adult to miss the "sloppy" crime scene they had awoken to, and instead interpret it as an unresponsive person. To clarify.I don't believe the dog will "have an impact" on the case. I never would've imagined what seems so obvious to some. "violation pertaining to dog" because the two surviving roommates knew who owned the dog and surely could have made arrangements for the dog to go directly to the owner. If there are found fingerprints opening our medical cabinets. from persons with ill intent.īut could there be some type of evidence that is pretty well outside the normalcy of common social gatherings.Īnd evidence that is beyond the societal norms?Įxample: Perhaps a guest has used our upstairs potty room.įingerprints would be found on potty handle,etc. Perhaps there is a challenge to distinguish evidence from a building that has multiple innocuous human activity. I am thinking any type of deranged killer would leave some type of DNA/evidence of SOME kind that would stand out from the "usual" finger prints/DNA/evidence of common house usage. I still think there are specific places where friends/family/acquaintances would not even THINK of exploring in our home bases. with quite a few people coming in and out of our apartment.Īnd even now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |